Re: [PATCH 3/9] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Support different GUIDs

From: Hans de Goede
Date: Thu Nov 17 2022 - 08:31:27 EST


Hi,

On 11/1/22 20:10, David E. Box wrote:
> Newer versions of Intel On Demand hardware may have an expanded list of
> registers to support new features. The register layout is identified by a
> unique GUID that's read during driver probe. Add support for handling
> different GUIDs and add support for current GUIDs [1].
>
> [1] https://github.com/intel/intel-sdsi/blob/master/os-interface.rst
>
> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

With Andy's remarks fixed this looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>

Regards,

Hans



> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c
> index bca05b4dd983..ab1f65919fc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c
> @@ -27,10 +27,10 @@
> #define ACCESS_TYPE_LOCAL 3
>
> #define SDSI_MIN_SIZE_DWORDS 276
> -#define SDSI_SIZE_CONTROL 8
> #define SDSI_SIZE_MAILBOX 1024
> -#define SDSI_SIZE_REGS 72
> +#define SDSI_SIZE_REGS 80
> #define SDSI_SIZE_CMD sizeof(u64)
> +#define SDSI_SIZE_MAILBOX 1024
>
> /*
> * Write messages are currently up to the size of the mailbox
> @@ -76,6 +76,9 @@
> #define DT_TBIR GENMASK(2, 0)
> #define DT_OFFSET(v) ((v) & GENMASK(31, 3))
>
> +#define SDSI_GUID_V1 0x006DD191
> +#define SDSI_GUID_V2 0xF210D9EF
> +
> enum sdsi_command {
> SDSI_CMD_PROVISION_AKC = 0x04,
> SDSI_CMD_PROVISION_CAP = 0x08,
> @@ -100,6 +103,9 @@ struct sdsi_priv {
> void __iomem *control_addr;
> void __iomem *mbox_addr;
> void __iomem *regs_addr;
> + int control_size;
> + int maibox_size;
> + int registers_size;
> u32 guid;
> u32 features;
> };
> @@ -444,6 +450,18 @@ static ssize_t registers_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
> struct sdsi_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> void __iomem *addr = priv->regs_addr;
> + int size = priv->registers_size;
> +
> + /*
> + * The check below is performed by the sysfs caller based on the static
> + * file size. But this may be greater than the actual size which is based
> + * on the GUID. So check here again based on actual size before reading.
> + */
> + if (off >= size)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (off + count > size)
> + count = size - off;
>
> memcpy_fromio(buf, addr + off, count);
>
> @@ -496,6 +514,24 @@ static const struct attribute_group sdsi_group = {
> };
> __ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(sdsi);
>
> +static int sdsi_get_layout(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct disc_table *table)
> +{
> + switch (table->guid) {
> + case SDSI_GUID_V1:
> + priv->control_size = 8;
> + priv->registers_size = 72;
> + break;
> + case SDSI_GUID_V2:
> + priv->control_size = 16;
> + priv->registers_size = 80;
> + break;
> + default:
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "Unrecognized GUID 0x%x\n", table->guid);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int sdsi_map_mbox_registers(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct pci_dev *parent,
> struct disc_table *disc_table, struct resource *disc_res)
> {
> @@ -537,7 +573,7 @@ static int sdsi_map_mbox_registers(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct pci_dev *paren
> if (IS_ERR(priv->control_addr))
> return PTR_ERR(priv->control_addr);
>
> - priv->mbox_addr = priv->control_addr + SDSI_SIZE_CONTROL;
> + priv->mbox_addr = priv->control_addr + priv->control_size;
> priv->regs_addr = priv->mbox_addr + SDSI_SIZE_MAILBOX;
>
> priv->features = readq(priv->regs_addr + SDSI_ENABLED_FEATURES_OFFSET);
> @@ -572,6 +608,11 @@ static int sdsi_probe(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev, const struct auxiliary_de
>
> priv->guid = disc_table.guid;
>
> + /* Get guid based layout info */
> + ret = sdsi_get_layout(priv, &disc_table);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> /* Map the SDSi mailbox registers */
> ret = sdsi_map_mbox_registers(priv, intel_cap_dev->pcidev, &disc_table, disc_res);
> if (ret)