Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: dts: ti: add k3-j721e-beagleboneai64

[Robert Nelson]

Thanks Nishanth

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 2:04 PM Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-beagleboneai64.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-beagleboneai64.dts

> > +
> > +             led-4 {
> > +                     gpios = <&main_gpio0 109 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > +                     linux,default-trigger = "phy0tx";
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.yaml#n82
>
> we'd be Violating the oneOf conditions here.

Removed..

> > +
> > +     vdd_mmc1: regulator-3 {
> > +             compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > +             pinctrl-names = "default";
> > +             pinctrl-0 = <&sd_pwr_en_pins_default>;
> > +             regulator-name = "vdd_mmc1";
> > +             regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > +             regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > +             regulator-boot-on;
> > +             enable-active-high;
> > +             vin-supply = <&vsys_3v3>;
> > +             gpios = <&main_gpio0 82 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/fixed-regulator.yaml
>
> s/gpios/gpio ?

cleaned up these old gpios -> gpio references...

> > +&main_gpio0 {
> > +     gpio-line-names = "", "P9_11", "P9_13", "P8_17", "P8_18", /* 0-4 */
> > +             "P8_22", "P8_24", "P8_34", "P8_36", "P8_38A", /* 5-9 */
> > +             "P9_23", "P8_37B", "P9_26B", "P9_24B", "P8_08", /* 10-14 */
> > +             "P8_07", "P8_10", "P8_09", "P9_42B", "", /* 15-19 */
> > +             "P8_03", "TYPEC_PWR_ST", "M2_RSTz", "M2_I2C_ALERT#", "P8_35A", /* 20-24 */
> > +             "P8_33A", "P8_32A", "", "P9_17A", "", /* 25-29 */
> > +             "P8_21", "P8_23", "P8_31A", "P8_05", "P8_06", /* 30-34 */
> > +             "P8_25", "M2_W_DISABLE1#", "M2_W_DISABLE2#", "P9_22A (BOOTMODE1)", "P9_21A", /* 35-39 */
> > +             "P9_18A", "DSI_I2C_SCL", "DSI_I2C_SDA", "P9_28B", "P9_30B", /* 40-44 */
> > +             "P9_12", "P9_27A", "P9_15", "P8_04 (BOOTMODE2)", "VCC_DP_EN", /* 45-49 */
> > +             "P9_33B", "P8_26", "P9_31B", "P9_29B", "P9_39B", /* 50-54 */
> > +             "P9_35B", "P9_36B", "P9_37B", "P9_38B", "P8_12", /* 55-59 */
> > +             "P8_11 (BOOTMODE7)", "P8_15", "P8_16", "", "", /* 60-64 */
> > +             "P8_43", "P8_44", "P8_41", "P8_42 (BOOTMODE6)", "P8_39", /* 65-69 */
> > +             "P8_40", "P8_27", "P8_28", "P8_29", "P8_30", /* 70-74 */
> > +             "P8_14", "P8_20", "P9_20B", "P9_19B", "P8_45", /* 75-79 */
> > +             "P8_46 (BOOTMODE3)", "P9_40B", "VDD_SD_EN", "CSI_I2C_SCL", "CSI_I2C_SDA", /* 80-84 */
> > +             "M2_I2S_SCK", "M2_I2S_WS", "M2_I2S_IN", "P8_19", "P8_13", /* 85-89 */
> > +             "P9_21B", "P9_22B", "M2_I2S_OUT", "P9_14", "P9_16", /* 90-94 */
> > +             "USR1", "USR0", "USR2", "DSI_GPIO1", "FAN_PWM", /* 95-99 */
> > +             "FAN_TACH", "CSI1_GPIO1", "CSI0_GPIO2", "CSI0_GPIO1", "P9_25B", /* 100-104 */
> > +             "P8_38B", "P8_37A", "CSI1_GPIO2", "DSI_GPIO2", "USR4", /* 105-109 */
> > +             "USR3", "P8_33B", "DP_HPD", "M2_UART_CTSn", "M2_UART_RTSn", /* 110-114 */
> > +             "P9_17B", "P8_35B", "VDD_SD_SEL", "P9_26A", "P9_24A", /* 115-119 */
> > +             "P9_18B", "CONSOLE_RX", "CONSOLE_TX", "P9_42A", "P9_27B", /* 120-124 */
> > +             "M2_UART_RX", "M2_UART_TX", "P9_25A"; /* 125-127 */
>
> Can we drop the gpio-line-names description for now?
> gpio-line-names: maxItems: 32 in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/ti,omap-gpio.yaml - that probably
> should be fixed prior to this else we get the dtbs_check warning around
> this. The max count actually depends on ti,ngpio - So, I think the
> schema is probably not accurate here.

Removed for now, till we are ready..

Regards,

-- 
Robert Nelson
https://rcn-ee.com/