On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 18:25:21 +0800Yes, I'm fixing the situation you mentioned.
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
print_trace_line may overflow seq_file buffer. If the event is not
consumed, the while loop keeps peeking this event, causing a infinite loop.
Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v1:
- Print partial line to show the broken trace event when overflowed print_trace_line
kernel/trace/trace.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 47a44b055a1d..81c36dc80212 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -6786,7 +6786,32 @@ tracing_read_pipe(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
ret = print_trace_line(iter);
if (ret == TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE) {
- /* don't print partial lines */
+ /*
+ * If one trace_line of the tracer overflows seq_file
+ * buffer, trace_seq_to_user returns -EBUSY.
+ * In this case, we need to consume, otherwise,
+ * while loop will peek this event next time,
+ * resulting in an infinite loop.
+ */
+ if (trace_seq_has_overflowed(&iter->seq)) {
We need to only do this if save_len is zero. Because the reason that it
returns TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE is usually because it overflowed.
This loops until the trace_seq is full, so it's OK to have it overflow.
The case I believe you are fixing, is the case were one
print_trace_line() actually fills the entire trace_seq in one shot. In
which case, it will never print, and in that case, save_len will be zero.