Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: gce: add gce header file for mt8188

[Elvis Wang (王军)]

On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 12:18 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 06/11/2022 11:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 04/11/2022 08:44, Elvis.Wang wrote:
> > > From: Elvis Wang <Elvis.Wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > add gce header file to define the gce thread priority, gce subsys
> > > id,
> > > event and constant for mt8188.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Elvis Wang <Elvis.Wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Thanks for the reviews, I have removed the incorrect reviewed
> > > message.
> > > ---
> > >   include/dt-bindings/gce/mediatek,mt8188-gce.h | 966
> > > ++++++++++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 966 insertions(+)
> > >   create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/gce/mediatek,mt8188-
> > > gce.h
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/gce/mediatek,mt8188-gce.h
> > > b/include/dt-bindings/gce/mediatek,mt8188-gce.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..e2e2c56016a1
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/gce/mediatek,mt8188-gce.h
> > 
> > 
> > What is a "gce" subsystem or type of hardware? Why do you put
> > headers in
> > "gce"?
> > 
> 
> Yes, I think we should move all header files from the gce folder into
> the 
> mailbox folder.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias

There are still a lot of header files undre gce. If all of them are
moved, it will also involve the modification of yaml and corresponding
project dts files, which requires more effort. Can we deal with the
8188 part first?

Best regards,
Elvis

> 
> > Don't continue this pattern. Mediatek devices do not get specific
> > folders...
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> >