Re: [PATCH v2] device property: fix of node refcount leak in fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint()

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Tue Nov 22 2022 - 07:57:47 EST


On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 02:54:36PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:00:39PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:

One more thing below.

...

> > fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> > struct fwnode_handle *prev)
> > {
> > + struct fwnode_handle *ep, *port_parent = NULL;
> > const struct fwnode_handle *parent;
> > - struct fwnode_handle *ep;
> >
> > /*
> > * If this function is in a loop and the previous iteration returned
> > * an endpoint from fwnode->secondary, then we need to use the secondary
> > * as parent rather than @fwnode.
> > */
> > - if (prev)
> > - parent = fwnode_graph_get_port_parent(prev);
> > - else
> > + if (prev) {
> > + port_parent = fwnode_graph_get_port_parent(prev);
> > + parent = port_parent;
> > + } else {
> > parent = fwnode;
> > + }
> > if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(parent))
> > return NULL;
> >
> > ep = fwnode_call_ptr_op(parent, graph_get_next_endpoint, prev);
> > - if (ep)

> > + if (ep) {
> > + fwnode_handle_put(port_parent);
> > return ep;
> > + }

if (ep)
goto out;

> > - return fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent->secondary, NULL);
> > + ep = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent->secondary, NULL);

out:

> > + fwnode_handle_put(port_parent);
> > + return ep;
>
> It seems too complicated for the simple fix.
>
> As I said, just drop const qualifier and add fwnode_handle_get() in the 'else'
> branch. This will allow you to drop if (prev) at the end.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko