Re: [PATCH v7 06/20] x86/virt/tdx: Shut down TDX module in case of error

[Dave Hansen]

On 11/22/22 01:20, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Either the Changelog is broken or this TDX crud is worse crap than I
> thought possible, because the only way to actually meet that requirement
> as stated is stop_machine().

I think the changelog is broken.  I don't see anything in the TDX module
spec about "the SEMACALL can run concurrently on different CPUs".
Shutdown, as far as I can tell, just requires that the shutdown seamcall
be run once on each CPU.  Concurrency and ordering don't seem to matter
at all.