Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/page_alloc: merge two get_pfnblock_migratetype() into one

From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Wed Nov 23 2022 - 10:45:17 EST


On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:40:43PM +0800, wonder_rock@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Deyan Wang <wonder_rock@xxxxxxx>
>
> It is safe to get_pfnblock_migratetype() in critical section,
> so just call get_pfnblock_migratetype() once.

No, you don't understand. zone->lock is HOT and we want to avoid
calling get_pfnblock_migratetype() under the lock, if we can avoid it.
Which we usually can.

> Signed-off-by: Deyan Wang <wonder_rock@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 6652df1f5cc8..c7ba9d65d1c0 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1704,13 +1704,8 @@ static void __free_pages_ok(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
> if (!free_pages_prepare(page, order, true, fpi_flags))
> return;
>
> - migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
> -
> spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
> - if (unlikely(has_isolate_pageblock(zone) ||
> - is_migrate_isolate(migratetype))) {
> - migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
> - }
> + migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
> __free_one_page(page, pfn, zone, order, migratetype, fpi_flags);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>