Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] irqchip: irq-mtk-cirq: Move register offsets to const array

[Marc Zyngier]

On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:57:02 +0000,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >> +					 enum mtk_cirq_reg_index idx,
> >> +					 unsigned int cirq_num)
> > 
> > What does cirq_num mean for registers that are not relative to an
> > interrupt? Create a separate helper for those.
> > 
> Means literally nothing, so yes I agree, but...
> 
> ... mtk_cirq_irq_reg(), mtk_cirq_reg() feels too similar and may lead to
> confusion while reading the code.
> 
> Any advice about a possibly clear-er name?

I think the names are OK. Passing an interrupt number as a parameter
is a good discriminant anyway.

Please wait for a few days before posting the next version though.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.