Re: Kernel 6.0.5 breaks virtual machines that boot from nfs mounted qcow2 images

[Anders Blomdell]

On 2022-11-23 18:51, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> > On Nov 23, 2022, at 12:49 PM, Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 23 Nov 2022, at 5:08, Anders Blomdell wrote:
> >
> > > Our problems turned out to be a fallout of Al Viros's splice rework, where nfsd reads with non-zero offsets and not ending
> > > on a page boundary failed to remap the last page. I belive that this is a decent fix for that problem (tested on v6.1-rc6,
> > > 6.0.7 and 6.0.9)
> > >
> > > ---- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > > +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> > > @@ -873,7 +873,7 @@ nfsd_splice_actor(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, struct pipe_buffer *buf,
> > >         unsigned offset = buf->offset;
> > >          page += offset / PAGE_SIZE;
> > > -       for (int i = sd->len; i > 0; i -= PAGE_SIZE)
> > > +       for (int i = sd->len + offset % PAGE_SIZE; i > 0; i -= PAGE_SIZE)
> > >                 svc_rqst_replace_page(rqstp, page++);
> > >         if (rqstp->rq_res.page_len == 0)        // first call
> > >                 rqstp->rq_res.page_base = offset % PAGE_SIZE;
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have insight into how we could possibly have caught this in testing?
>
> Was also wondering this. I had though fstests (via fsx) would have exercised
> this usage scenario.
My guess is that one has to look very hard at qcow2 handling in qemu...

/Anders


--
Anders Blomdell                  Email: anders.blomdell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Department of Automatic Control
Lund University                  Phone:    +46 46 222 4625
P.O. Box 118
SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden