Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: A collection of typo and documentation fixes

[Randy Dunlap]

On 11/23/22 11:35, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> I've been collecting these typo fixes for a while and it feels like
> time to send them in.
> 
> Signed-off-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@xxxxxxxxxx>


Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks.

(although I would prefer to see CPU instead of cpu, but that's no
reason to hold up this patch)

> ---
>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  include/linux/dma-buf.h   |  6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> index dd0f83ee505b..614ccd208af4 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_unmap_attachment, DMA_BUF);
>   *
>   * @dmabuf:	[in]	buffer which is moving
>   *
> - * Informs all attachmenst that they need to destroy and recreated all their
> + * Informs all attachments that they need to destroy and recreate all their
>   * mappings.
>   */
>  void dma_buf_move_notify(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
> @@ -1159,11 +1159,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_move_notify, DMA_BUF);
>  /**
>   * DOC: cpu access
>   *
> - * There are mutliple reasons for supporting CPU access to a dma buffer object:
> + * There are multiple reasons for supporting CPU access to a dma buffer object:
>   *
>   * - Fallback operations in the kernel, for example when a device is connected
>   *   over USB and the kernel needs to shuffle the data around first before
> - *   sending it away. Cache coherency is handled by braketing any transactions
> + *   sending it away. Cache coherency is handled by bracketing any transactions
>   *   with calls to dma_buf_begin_cpu_access() and dma_buf_end_cpu_access()
>   *   access.
>   *
> @@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_move_notify, DMA_BUF);
>   *   replace ION buffers mmap support was needed.
>   *
>   *   There is no special interfaces, userspace simply calls mmap on the dma-buf
> - *   fd. But like for CPU access there's a need to braket the actual access,
> + *   fd. But like for CPU access there's a need to bracket the actual access,
>   *   which is handled by the ioctl (DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC). Note that
>   *   DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC can fail with -EAGAIN or -EINTR, in which case it must
>   *   be restarted.
> @@ -1264,10 +1264,10 @@ static int __dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
>   * preparations. Coherency is only guaranteed in the specified range for the
>   * specified access direction.
>   * @dmabuf:	[in]	buffer to prepare cpu access for.
> - * @direction:	[in]	length of range for cpu access.
> + * @direction:	[in]	direction of access.
>   *
>   * After the cpu access is complete the caller should call
> - * dma_buf_end_cpu_access(). Only when cpu access is braketed by both calls is
> + * dma_buf_end_cpu_access(). Only when cpu access is bracketed by both calls is
>   * it guaranteed to be coherent with other DMA access.
>   *
>   * This function will also wait for any DMA transactions tracked through
> @@ -1307,7 +1307,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_begin_cpu_access, DMA_BUF);
>   * actions. Coherency is only guaranteed in the specified range for the
>   * specified access direction.
>   * @dmabuf:	[in]	buffer to complete cpu access for.
> - * @direction:	[in]	length of range for cpu access.
> + * @direction:	[in]	direction of access.
>   *
>   * This terminates CPU access started with dma_buf_begin_cpu_access().
>   *
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> index 71731796c8c3..1d61a4f6db35 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ struct dma_buf {
>  	 * @lock:
>  	 *
>  	 * Used internally to serialize list manipulation, attach/detach and
> -	 * vmap/unmap. Note that in many cases this is superseeded by
> +	 * vmap/unmap. Note that in many cases this is superseded by
>  	 * dma_resv_lock() on @resv.
>  	 */
>  	struct mutex lock;
> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ struct dma_buf {
>  	 */
>  	const char *name;
>  
> -	/** @name_lock: Spinlock to protect name acces for read access. */
> +	/** @name_lock: Spinlock to protect name access for read access. */
>  	spinlock_t name_lock;
>  
>  	/**
> @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ struct dma_buf {
>  	 *   anything the userspace API considers write access.
>  	 *
>  	 * - Drivers may just always add a write fence, since that only
> -	 *   causes unecessarily synchronization, but no correctness issues.
> +	 *   causes unnecessary synchronization, but no correctness issues.
>  	 *
>  	 * - Some drivers only expose a synchronous userspace API with no
>  	 *   pipelining across drivers. These do not set any fences for their

-- 
~Randy